pay commission 7th cpc allowances hike committee arun jaitley india defence forces diwali gift gdp salary hike allowances pay commission


A cashier uses a machine to count 500 Indian rupee banknotes as customers wait in queues inside a post office in Lucknow, India, November 10, 2016. Post office employees were among the lakhs of Central government employees who benefited from the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission.Reuters file

It's a tad unbelievable that an outgo of about Rs 34,600 crore during the July-September quarter (Q2) on account of salary arrears and enhanced pay to Central government employees did not boost the Indian economy in terms of higher consumption.
On Monday, the Modi government said the GDP growth rate for the April-September 2016 was 7.1 percent; when seen in the context of 7.1 percent expansion in Q1, it seems things more or less remained unchanged.
"Despite subdued growth in the world economy, India has maintained a GDP growth rate of 7.2 per cent in 2014-15, 7.6 per cent in 2015-16, and 7.1 per cent during April to September of 2016-17," Nirmala Sitharaman, commerce and industry minister told the Lok Sabha in a written reply on Monday, reported IANS.
In other words, the much-flaunted boost to the economy did not happen, despite the salary hike and arrears, in addition to a normal monsoon that was supposed to have lifted rural demand.
"The combined outgo for the Centre on account of arrears for January to July and payments for August will total Rs 34,600 crore," ratings agency India Ratings (Ind-Ra) had said in August.
The recommendations of the 7th CPC cover 47 lakh Central government employees and 53 lakh pensioners, of which 14 lakh employees and 18 lakh pensioners are from the defence forces.

Is there something amiss?
The question gains credence when seen with the growth in the volume sales for automobile companies, of 13.22 percent in July, 23.72 percent in August and 20.16 percent in September. If the increase in volume sales can't be attributed to pay hike, then it raises another question: did employees simply invest most of the money with banks and in other instruments, reflecting in a spike in bank deposits in September?